NewStats: 3,264,365 , 8,183,480 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 06:37 PM o2g5l

What is the current cost?

https://nairaland.moviesx.org/8320909/efcc-operative-halisu-sahabi-killed

The painful aspect of this case is that the EFCC is not the agency that would conduct the investigation and prosecution of the murder case.

helinues:


At least get 1/8 of such reputation before rubbishing those who are in their highest level

I am not the one rubbishing his reputation. Maybe you should ask WikiLeaks for the source of their information.

In any case, I don't want such reputation. I am comfortable with where I am.

floss:
Afe might have skeletons from his cupboard that went missing, he’s not sure the particular one Dele caught (the evidence Dele have that can nail him and his reputation forever), so that’s why he’s insisting Dele pleads guilty and offer a rebuttal on the national dailies.

It might be surprising that Dele have no evidence but rather banking on the fact that Afe made the first wrong move of paying attention to him. What Dele might have maybe hearsay and he knows that the person he got such information might not be willing to stand as a witness.

Let’s see who will have the last laugh, like they always say

He who laugh last, laugh last

The reputation of the old man is tarnished already. It cannot be repaired or restored if I am permitted to use such words

[quote author=SoNature post=128313869]Multi Choice made over N277 billion last year in Nigeria alone. Then, imagine how much they make across the countries they operate in Africa.

There's no way the management of Multi Choice can sell such a business because it's a high-return investment. [/quote

Take note that Canal+ already had 35% percent stake in multi choice. What they are buying is 65% of the company.

Jewessgratitud3:
A colleague of mine called me last week and Said a woman needs a sounds teacher to come and take the child on sounds this summer to enable the child read before school resumes and that she wants someone with British diction.
So, because I'm a diction instructor and have done that kind of job in the past ( like nine years ago) my friend recommended me.

Back then ( 2014) when I was into this home lesson full time, I was charging 25k per child and its three times a week and I pick the places I go to. No long distance thing.
Now with the current situation of the economy and considering my age, I charged this woman 50k three times a week and she said it's too much. Meanwhile, the school the child is attending was where I taught before I left and started doing home lesson and their school fees then ( 2014) was 95k for prep class. By now it should be around 150k. My friend already told me the school the child attends.

She said it's too much that she can only afford 20k. I just ignored them. They will pay 150k for school fees, nothing much to show for it but will want to give you peanut and expect you to perform magic under 1month.

If I handle the child, no doubt, she'll read and her accent will change but definitely not for that amount. I'll now be trekking that long distance cos no bike and somebody is telling me 50k is too much.

Did I do wrong by ignoring them cos they want me to come and start this August but I have zeroed my mind there.

Would you accept such amount for home lesson?

Getting a good home lesson teacher is very difficult. I ed looking for one for my children some years back but I could not find a suitable one. Kudos to you.

When

officialwdhtv:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmjMGV6vgTw

Check out this All-Black chicken that sells for $6000usd

#wetindeyhappentv

Copy and paste researcher. The bird is available in Nigeria. It does not cost up to 500 dollars

taylor89:
His only crime was speaking in favor of common citizens for Government to ease their burden and suffering

Your oppressors call you and your gang gave you people highest go be 50k each to burn a building of a man who will survive any hardship but chose to speak for you

50k wey no go last one week finish

What did he speak that is in favour of the common man. NOTHING.

He should learn from Adam Oshiomole.

GChux1:


Dang! Sold out

Eyaaaaah

[quote author=GChux1 post=124028521][/quote]


Dell XPS 15 9570
Core i7-9750H
16GB RAM
512 SSD
GTX 1650 4gb
Backlit Keyboard
420k

Is this one still available?

Viz007:
Africa Politics
BREAKING: Tinubu’s Guinean port is “diplomatic port”, Embassy confirms
April 19, 2023 Nkiruka Nistoran 0 Comments africa, Nigeria, NigeriaDecides2023
Declines to provide details

The Embassy of the Republic of Guinea in Abuja, Nigeria, has confirmed that the Guinean port purportedly belonging to Nigeria’s president-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, is actually a diplomatic port.

The Guinean Embassy made the confirmation following a Freedom of Information application written to the diplomatic corp by News Band correspondent.

The application entitled “Freedom of Information Act Inquiry over Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Guinean citizenship” sought to obtain information on the port which has been trending online.

The application reads in part: “The Freedom of Information Act 2011 of the laws of the Federation of Nigeria is an Act to make public records and information more freely available, provide for public access to public records and information, protect public records and information to the extent consistent with the public interest and the protection of personal privacy.

“On the basis of the above-mentioned subject, I write to obtain detailed information on the attached document attached below which has been trending online for some time.

“According to the document, Nigeria’s president-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a citizen of Guinea, besides being a citizen of Nigeria.

“Can you kindly clarify the said issue to enable me provide accurate information to the reading public?

“I will appreciate your doing in line with the Freedom of Information Act.”

Responding, the Embassy of the Republic of Guinea stated that “the diplomatic port is issued only by the Presidency of the Republic.”

It, however, failed to “confirm the authenticity of this port.”

The Embassy wrote: “We inform you that in the Republic of Guinea, the diplomatic port is issued only by the Presidency of the Republic.

“Therefore, we regret that we cannot confirm the authenticity of this port.

“To find out more, we invite you to send us an official request via the Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accompanied by a copy of the port in question that we could send to the competent authorities in Guinea to whether the person concerned has benefited from the Guinean nationality.”

In reaction, News Band informed the Embassy that its “response was more of a smokescreen than a response”.

The applicant averred that it does not behoove on him to approach Guinean Government through the Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs since “it is clear that issuing ports is an internal affair, hence, has nothing to do with my country’s Foreign Affairs”.

He maintained that he has already sent a copy of the port in question as an attachment to the email, asking: “Do you expect me to go and collect the original from the purported holder, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who is currently “resting” in ?”

He reminded the Embassy that since he made no mention of “diplomatic port” but the fact that the Embassy went ahead and confirmed that the port in question is in circulation and that it is indeed a diplomatic one “is in itself an affirmation of some sort”.

Finally, he warned the Embassy that if within the next seven (7) days, as stipulated by Freedom of Information Act 2011, he still does not receive the desired response, he will approach a competent court of jurisdiction for redress.

The Embassy is yet to respond to the latest averment.


https://nkirukanistoran.com/breaking-tinubus-guinean-port-is-diplomatic-port-embassy-confirms/

But we all know that the Freedom of Information Act is not binding on a foreign entity

Onedayoneday:
Based on tips, I had to attend an interview today. The information was that if I am shortlisted, I will start work latest first week of March. So I was very happy and ready to do anything to attend the interview.

As an applicant without a kobo, I had to kneel down begging a neighbour before he borrowed me 1k to enable me pay my way. The transport fare to and from was to gulp N400 or more.

My in and out was just the 1k. In fact, my feeding was also inside the 1k - everything. So it was a priceless 1k that every kobo was very important.

Early in the morning, I heard people arguimg over the deadline for new naira notes. People refused to collect the old naira notes.

So I boarded a bus with the N1000 note which I paid to the conductor. My transport fare was N100. When I came down, the conductor gave me new N500 note and two old N200 notes, making it N900. I refused to collect the old N200 notes. He insisted he didnt have new naira notes to change for me. Argument ensued as I refused to collect the old notes.

Like I said, that was the only money with me. So I didnt want to take any chances of collecting old notes that I will later not be able to use. So in the midst of the argument, he wanted to move and leave, I tried to stop him by gently holding his t-shirt. I didnt know his polo shirt was that soft. Unluckily for me, the polo got torn.

That was how war was declared. The conductor and the driver descended on me. They first targeted at tearing my shirt too despite showing remorsefulness over getting his shirt torn. Not once, not twice, they kept tearing my shirt till at some point, I put a resistance. Of course that couldn't be without a fight. I won't lie, those guys dealt with me. Two agbero hands descending on one non-agbero hand. Before people could intervene, they tore my shirt and a part of my tro, gave me serious bruises, got me so dirty and stopped me from attending the interview.

I went back home like a mad man.

A very sad day for me.

May God help and bless me with a well-paid job.

The struggle continues!!!

Dont add to the wahala by voting for those who put us in this wahala

Etemma1:
Good morning. My number is on the post. You can reach me on 08164788344 (WhatsApp).

Noted. I will get in touch

Etemma1:
r

How do i reach you? Interested in a whole lot of your offers if they are still available....quillbot, turnitin and this wordtune

wwwihy:
God Bless BRF
God Bless Incoming President Bola Tinubu
God Bless President Buhari
God Bless APC
God Bless Federal Republic of Nigeria



God punish PDP
God punish anyone shouting vote Obi and labour party
God punish miscreants, wailers and enemies of Nigeria

You should have ask your Emilokun how many bridges did he build in Lagos? I hear stay Lagos traffic na standstill

Holybaddo:
Before marrying her He would have seen red flags


But love of Kpekus won’t allow him to think properly

RED FLAGS ABI

YOU THINK SAY DEM DEY HANG THE RED FLAG FOR NECK?

SOME DO NOT HAVE ANY FLAG AT ALL.

IT HITS YOU FROM THE BLUES

kenzysmith:
Maradona wey don die still dey produce money me wey dey no get idea how to make 1k a day Chai. If I be maradona pikin I go just carry one dirty boxers come out say this is the boxer her wore to score the wonder goal to be auction for 1billion

The ball does not belong to Maradona. It is being auctioned by the referee.

Not sure if any of the money will go to the estate of Maradona

Explorers:
4 years ago:

https://nairaland.moviesx.org/4790836/explorers-welcomes-little-princess-shares#72125159




On Wednesday, 5th October, 2022, my baby turned 4. We had a photoshoot and celebrated in a little way with neighbor's kids.

Then and now photos.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO THE LITTLE EXPLORER. MAY SHE INCREASE IN WISDOM AND IN STATURE AND BE IN FAVOUR WITH GOD AND MAN

politicoNG:
Ambassador Taofeek Arapaja : Deputy National Chairman South.

Prof. Stella Effah-Attoe. National Woman Leader.

Chief Dan Osi Orbih.
National Vice Chairman South-South.

Dr. Ali Odefa.
National vice Chairman South-East

Hon Olasoji Adagunodo
National vice chairman South-West.

Hon Setonji Koshoedo
Deputy National Secretary.

The ones in the North kept their money. E nor concern them

UnusualEmissary:
Normally, nothing overturns established authority. If someone gains authority over another by virtue of some established factor, that authority stands.

A 27 year old boss commands the obedience (to some degree) of his 50 year old employee regardless of the age difference. A king commands the obedience of his subjects no matter how old, rich or powerful they may be in their own right.

Your grandma, by virtue of being a mother to your father, commands his obedience regardless of how "big" your father may be.

That's life.

To cap it all, even the dad will not dare delegate the buying of the recharge card to another person in the presence of the grandma

Generalissimo75:


Bishop Oyedepo was a Yoruba man and a Nigerian before he became a Christian.

He WAS? I thought he IS

Obojuju:
We are determined to continue to use our social programmes, intellectual platforms and our compelling songs to advocate for good governance and ability!

These guys are badass

sojiboy:
AKPATA'S PILATIC VERDICT: IS THIS BRAVERY OR BRAVADO? BY ISHAYA BABAGANA

No neutral observer would have imagined the tenor of Pilate’s verdict when, the other day, he was confronted with the decision of releasing a prisoner in commemoration of the feast. Pilate’s seat of government was of course in Jerusalem. A city where the enigmatic Christ had just healed a man who was born blind, another man who was crippled for 38 years, and yet another woman with an 18 year-old infirmity. No one would have thought that the assembly would opt for the release of the murderer and insurrectionist known as Barabbas, against the one who had brought smiles to the faces of families and people both within and outside the city of Jerusalem.

Fast-forward to about two thousand years later, in New Delhi, a city about 4000 kilometers from Jerusalem, Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of India’s non-violent independence movement against British rule and an advocated for the civil rights of Indians was also murdered in cold blood. His murder was never by any of the British men against whom Ghandi had led protests and revolutions, but by one of the Indians for whom Ghandi lived his entire life. The list is indeed endless, and this explains why like the witnesses to Pilate’s verdict, one may not be surprised at the recent developments within the legal circus.

Just about yesterday, lawyers were greeted with the Petition against Mrs. Adekunbi Ogunde (of the infamous email), a partner in the law firm of Wole Olanipekun & Co. The petition after outlining all of Ogunde’s delinquencies, did not only seek the prosecution of the respondent to the petition, but also urged the committee to consider whether the partners of the firm of Wole Olanipekun & Co., are not liable to be disciplined by the body. By the partners, they were simply referring to Chief Wole Olanipekun and Bode Olanipekun. The first thing that jumps at someone like me, were the several ironies with which the petition was gorgeously adorned. The applicant was described as “The Incorporated Trustees of the Nigerian Bar Association”. This irony will only make meaning to those who know or that it was Chief Olanipekun who facilitated the registration of the Nigerian Bar Association with the Corporate Affairs Commission, as a body of Incorporated Trustees, perhaps as a remedy to the outfall of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fawehinmi v. NBA. While Olanipekun did not become President of the NBA until 2002, Fawehinmi v. NBA had been handed down since 1989; so, several presidents of the NBA had come and gone before him. Therefore, it took a remarkable quantum of incisiveness to consider it imperative to fill the void created by the lack of juristic personality for a body as the NBA, and Olanipekun made it happen. It is therefore, an irony of sort, that in the same name (“The Incorporated Trustees of the Nigerian Bar Association”) they now urge the LPDC to see to the disciplining of Wole Olanipekun. I must quickly state here that I have not elevated Wole Olanipekun above the law, but as you will see in the latter part of this piece when I address the impropriety of NBA’s entreaty, there is more to it that meets the eyes.

Another irony is the fact that the originating application that accompanied the petition had the NBA stamp of the signatory, Mr. John Aikpokpo-Martins. Today, lawyers take pride in affixing their stamps and seals to legal processes and documents in uniquely marking out their documents from those of touts or non-lawyers. In fact, successive NBA presidents have built their campaigns and policies round the idea of the NBA stamp and seal, with diverse commendable modifications. But then, only a few would that this innovation was the brainchild of Wole Olanipekun and his team, while he held sway as the NBA president.

At the dinner hosted to mark the commencement of the NBA Section on Business Law on July 23, 2022, the incumbent NBA President like a lot of other speakers basked glowingly in their hip of NBA SBL with enviable iration. Of a truth, the NBA SBL has contributed immensely to the NBA profile with its finesse and robust programs. However, only a few would that this was one of the innovations of Olanipekun’s tenure, which paraded an array of quintessential legal minds like Mrs. Funke Adekoya SAN, Dele Adesina, SAN, Ikeazor Akaraiwe (now, SAN) and Festus Okoye, amongst others. I vividly recall that the creation of the Section on Business Law and the Section on Legal Practice stood conspicuously in the list of Olanipekun’s campaign promises for election as the NBA President. Eventually, Mr. George Etomi and Mallam Yusuf Ali, SAN were appointed as the pioneer chairmen of the respective sections and the sections have turned out to become a success story today. Is it not an irony that on the same day that Akpata reveled in his hip of the NBA SBL, a petition was filed against a third party, wherein the LPDC is eccentrically urged to discipline Mr. Olanipekun?

Even after completing his tenure as NBA President, he continued in his service to the NBA in ways which sober onlookers could not, but notice. Some of us are yet to forget the many hues that engulfed the legal space when the Federal Government led by Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan enacted the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011. Lawyers were concerned that the provisions of sections 5 and 25 of the Act which required them to also obtain licences from the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering (SCUML) before opening bank s as well as to be making certain disclosures which are in contravention of the attorney-client confidentiality. It was this same Olanipekun that the then President of the Bar, Okey Wali, SAN approached to lead a team of senior lawyers who ran to the Federal High Court to challenge the provisions. Olanipekun, leading Mrs. Funke Adekoya, SAN and Babajide Ogundipe, who all worked pro bono were able to get the Federal High Court to set aside those offending provisions of the Money Laundering Act and today all lawyers within the country are beneficiaries. The judgment of the Federal High Court was appealed to the Court of Appeal, and it was the same Olanipekun who pro bono, represented the NBA at the Court of Appeal where the decision of the Federal High Court was affirmed. Records indicate that the decision of the Court of Appeal has been appealed to the Supreme Court and it is again, the same Olanipekun who has filed a respondent’s brief on behalf of the NBA. While I am unable to confirm if the Supreme Court’s brief is also pro bono, it is only fair that when lawyers take benefit of these judgments, they ought to note that they did not fall from heaven like manners. Thoughtfully, this ‘patriotic’ act did not go without the commendation of the then President of the NBA, Augustine Alegeh, SAN, who described the judgment as “a landmark judgment that provides relief to all lawyers.”

I had in ing, referenced a petition wherein, the ed Trustees of the NBA is the applicant, against Mrs. Adekunbi Ogunde, a partner in the law firm of Wole Olanipekun & Co. The fact that the NBA has suddenly woken up to its disciplinary responsibilities would have excited some of us. However, for so many reasons, the excitement only lasted until the last paragraph of the petition. At first, the body of the petition had chronologically highlighted the genealogy of the petition. In fact, it had reproduced in extenso, Mrs. Ogunde’s email, which is the subject of controversy and of course, misconduct. Fair enough, the petition also mentioned the fact that the author of the email (the Respondent) took responsibility for the email, itted the allegation and sought to “exculpate her law firm.” However, the same person is praying the LPDC to consider whether the partners of the firm, that is Wole Olanipekun and Bode Olanipekun (and other partners in the firm which I do not know) are not liable to be disciplined. The reason for this goose chase, according to the petition, is that the respondent, Mrs. Ogunde has the ostensible authority to act as partner. This kind of position, supposedly coming from persons perceived as senior lawyers, leaves more to be desired in of aptitude, know-how and capacity. It leaves more questions than answers. If you are convinced that the other partners are also culpable, why then did you need the direction of the LPDC as to whether they should be disciplined? Did you seek the same direction from the LPDC before bringing the petition against the current respondent? According to the author, the basis for seeking this directive is that the lady in question had ostensible authority to act as partner. Interestingly, one would have expected that people who occupy the highest offices in the NBA would know better that one of the exceptions to the vicarious liability of a partnership is in relation to acts done without the authority of the firm and acts which are not apparently for carrying on the business of the partnership in the usual way.

Having, therefore, itted that their respondent, Ogunde had already itted to her wrongdoing, by stating categorically that she never had the instruction of anyone to so do, it then smacks of malafide for Akpata and his crew to urge the LPDC to consider whether the partners also ought to be disciplined. Meanwhile, can there even be vicarious criminal or quasi-criminal liability? The foregoing contentions are more so, in light of the recent decision of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria in Suit No. NICN /PHC/120/2021 between Mr. Wilson Udo Essien v. Unitech Drilling Company Ltd, where the court in an entirely different matter on June 15, 2022, held that the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners in Nigeria (RPC) 2007, regulate individual lawyer’s conduct and not that of the law firm. This position is a restatement of several directions of the LPDC over the years, which Akpata and his men ought to have known better.

In any event, anyone who thinks that their slips as indicated above are innocent ones, committed in good faith, would have had a rethink, seeing Olumide Akpata’s follow up letter, which for reasons best known to them, they chose to give a very wide media circulation. The said letter lays bare, the primary intendment of the petition, being the desire to get at the ‘big fish’. Otherwise, how would you explain a call for Olanipekun’s “stepping aside” as BOB Chairman, when in fact, the LPDC is meant to be an independent committee and appeals go directly to the Supreme Court? Is Olumide Akpata truly telling the whole world that his intendment of including the very nocuous clause in the closing paragraph of the supposed petition was to lay a foundation for the mischief? Is the Akpata laying a precedent that for the sin of every partner in a law firm, the heads of all other partners must roll, even when the partner does not deny sole responsibility? Can Akpata in his heart of hearts, devoid of shenanigans and grandstanding, truly come out to say that for the misconduct of any or all of the other 13 partners in his law office, he would submit himself to the Golgotha? It is still very fresh in our minds how Mr. Emmanuel Ukala, the immediate past chairman of the LPDC and some other of the LPDC whose name I cannot immediately recall, resigned in protest, citing attempts at unlawfully meddling into the affairs of the LPDC by the BOB? Like Akpata’s letter, Mr. Ukala’s letter was also made public and he was not equivocal about Olanipekun’s stance about the independence of the LPDC from the BOB and the impropriety of an intervention. So, what has changed now? Have quickly forgotten that the election that ushered in Akpata as NBA president was conducted at a period when the then President, Paul Usoro, SAN was undergoing a criminal trial at the Federal High Court? It is rather a coincidence that it is this same Olanipekun that led the team of lawyers in defence of Mr. Usoro, who was later discharged and acquitted by the court. So, if we are all to dance to Akpata’s shuffle groove, then Usoro ought to have resigned while the trial lasted, thus convicting himself ahead of the court’s acquittal. Suggesting a ‘stepping aside’ to Olanipekun by someone who acts as the face of the complainant implies that even in the absence of a petition against Olanipekun, Akpata already considers him guilty of the charges currently lying somewhere in Akpata’s mind. If Akpata lacks faith and confidence in the LPDC, he should be bold enough to say so, as his current approach suggests that he considers all the of the LPDC, as men who lack the requisite independent mindedness to discharge their functions.

These issues deserve thorough interrogation as we all cannot be railroaded by Akpata’s bravado.

https://roundoffnews.com/akpatas-pilatic-verdict-bravery-or-bravado-by-ishaya-babagana/

Olanikpeku this Olanikpeku that.

Let him step aside.

Did you read the litany of things the partner said Olanikpeku can do?

Could it be that the lady is actually saying what they do in that office?

Too bad. We must rescue the bar from the grip of anyone. I mean anyone

doggedfighter:
Nigeria is indeed a nation in trouble.



Wanted criminals are turbaned for pacification while a known thief is aspiring for the highest political office in the country.


And DSS doesn't know the road to their houses but uses petty thieves to shine.

DSS and EFCC are useless

funshint:
What kind of thrash did I just read...this is a civil case or did she injure him? Journalism has been reduced to nonsense. What if the man was actually making a false accusation? Though he might be true anyway but she can still charge him for defamation.

Nothing stops her from bringing a defamation suit against the man. The slap is assault punishable under our criminal law even though I am sure her defence of provocation will exculpate her of criminal liability

nwekeugochukwu:
Stella Oduah Reacts To Claim Of Not Completing Her NYSC, Shares Evidence That She Did NYSC (Photos)

Former Minister of Aviation and Senator representing Anambra North, Stella Oduah has reacted to claim of not completing her service year, IGBERETV reports.

It was reported earlier that this was conveyed in a letter that purportedly served as a response to a request made by Concerned Anambra North Peoples Democratic Party Stakeholders. The group had asked the service to validate the senator's claim of losing her NYSC certificate.

The report also claimed that the Director General of the service in response to the request, said though Oduah was mobilised for national service in 1982/83 service year and was deployed to Lagos State, she absconded after the orientation and never completed the service.

However reacting to this, Stella Oduah has shared a photo of her in NYSC uniform and a letter from NECA confirming that she did her NYSC.

In a statement released by her media aide Ezennia Nonso Chukwudebe, it was stated that she "served meritoriously at NECA in 1982 as can be confirmed from this 11th January, 2017 clarification from the Nigeria Employers' Consultative Association personally signed by the Director General, O.A Oshinowo."

Oduah who accused her opponents of "resorting to circulating a story which is completely at variance with the position of the agency where she did her primary assignment", said they will be giving "NYSC sometime to put out a disclaimer as we firmly believe this letter to be fake."

The statement read;

*RE: THE VIRAL STORY OF THE ALLEGED SENATOR STELLA ODUAH NYSC ABSCONDMENT.*

Our attention has just been drawn to a publication that makes a most spurious claim to the effect that the Distinguished Senator representing Anambra North, Princess Stella Adaeze Oduah OON, absconded from the National Youth Service Corps program.

Ordinarily we would never dignify such antics with a response but we deemed it necessary to put out this statement for the benefit of gullible minds that are being targeted by political jobbers whose stock in trade is churning out such concocted rubbish every election cycle, especially when it is becoming glaring that they are receiving the short end of the political stick.

The Distinguished Senator indeed served meritoriously at NECA in 1982 as can be confirmed from this 11th January, 2017 clarification from the Nigeria Employers' Consultative Association personally signed by the Director General, O.A Oshinowo.

How her opponents have suddenly resorted to circulating this story which is completely at variance with the position of the agency where she did her primary assignment, is an issue every keen mind should focus on and we are by this publication, giving the NYSC sometime to put out a disclaimer as we firmly believe this letter to be fake.

Unfortunately we live in climes where such unsubstantiated stories travel fast and it is more worrisome that some mainstream media outlets appear to be sucked into this viral vortex of deciet.

Senator Stella Oduah did not only serve meritoriously but would go on to work in the NNPC, a Federal Government establishment, for the next nine years!

Nigerians need to understand that the persons behind the fake letter currently doing the rounds are desperate, despondent and out of their wits end for they instinctively appreciate the fact that the Distinguished Senator is one leader that continues to be appreciated and loved for her many people oriented programs and no amount of sponsored media mudslinging can obliterate this fact.

This is election season and it is expected to see such antics by weak traducers whose understanding of politicking is engaging in mindless subterfuge against aspirants rightly percieved as strong.

Unfortunately for them, they are deploying the same failed strategy that has never managed to stop the Distinguished Senator at the polls and one would expect that they'd restrategize.

Senator Stella Oduah remains strong, in very high spirits and is looking forward to the election proper.

Below is a letter Stella Oduah's aide wrote to the Director General of the National Youth Service Corps asking for the retraction of the statement against Stella Oduah within 48 hours.



https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0132Zf9DKaE3f4mpdiH1hpya8NrauS3eSmJ3YH8Xjz1cCEP9GoVY1YyV5iY4aRdoDl&id=1323657788

https://igberetvnews.com/1420723/stella-oduah-reacts-claim-completing-nysc-shares-evidence-nysc-photos/

Lalasticlala
Mynd44

Something is amiss somewhere. Why will someone write his place of primary assignment to confirm if he served there?

aminulive:
POLITICSNIGERIA.COM



https://politicsnigeria.com/breaking-names-of-apc-governors-that-signed-tinubus-2023-presidential-form/

Akeredolu is on the list too.

A sick person with a health certificate is obviously worse than a healthy person without a health certificate.

Sermwell:

This is from a layman's perspective! She can't take it back by law( promissory estoppel)

Layman my foot.

Read and understand your law before telling the world you are a LAWYER.

Promissory estoppel is only a defence in CONTRACTUAL situations where a party by his conduct has indicated that he will not insist on his rights. He is estopped from going back on his words.

Where is the CONTRACTUAL situation here?

Did the man offer any CONSIDERATION for the gift?

Sermwell:

This is from a layman's perspective! She can't take it back by law( promissory estoppel)

Promissory

Proudlyomonna:


If the receipt of a property bears your name,it's automatically yours to keep.
The court wouldn't care about whose money was used to buy the property.

When there is a dispute as to who is the actual owner, the court will check to know whose money is used in purchasing the item. This is the law.

THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE EFCC AND OTHER SECURITY OUTFITS LOOK BEHIND THE NAME OF THE PERSON ON A PROPERTY AND SEEKS TO KNOW WHO PROVIDED THE FUND FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY

oz4real83:
An advice to my fellow guys, when a babe gives you gifts that are supposed to have receipts but she doesn't give you the receipts along with the gifts claiming she will bring the receipts later or she forgot them, my guys, she has a plan for the future ooo just like this lady . Always learn to request for the receipts which must bear your name along with the gifts to avoid stories that touch. If na phone, collect receipt, if na car, also collect receipt.

She can take it back even if the receipt is in your name. The reason is simple. It was bought with her money? You should just tell her to give you the money so that you can buy it yourself. Do not let her transfer the money to you. Demand for the CASH