NewStats: 3,264,171 , 8,182,850 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 01:30 AM 4e3h24

If it is the middle east you will not even know who is bombing you.

Iran is yet to attack israel after close to 3 months

Cancri:
all this gragra, forget can stand on it's own without the usa , you and Japan they are great country with great engineers which Russia lacks.

Russia lacks engineer 😷
I don't even want to talk 😂

Allthelight:
If it is the middle east you will not even know who is bombing you.

Iran is yet to attack israel after close to 3 months

Iran still remains the only country to give them woto woto

Ricchmoen:
Russia lacks engineer 😷
I don't even want to talk 😂

Crazy talks. Some were even saying Russia's nukes don't work because they lack the resources needed to maintain them. Don't mind them. this is how they pushed Ukraine into this avoidable war

⚡Colombian President Petro called Zelensky’s agreement on rare earth metals “stupid”:

“Zelensky's stupidity, and I say this clearly, is that he allowed himself to be manipulated by Western Europeans who do not know where they are going, either to Hitler or to nowhere. Ukrainians are fighting with their Slavic brothers and in the end they are giving Ukraine to the Americans. Stupidity!”

WriteerNg:
⚡Colombian President Petro called Zelensky’s agreement on rare earth metals “stupid”:

“Zelensky's stupidity, and I say this clearly, is that he allowed himself to be manipulated by Western Europeans who do not know where they are going, either to Hitler or to nowhere. Ukrainians are fighting with their Slavic brothers and in the end they are giving Ukraine to the Americans. Stupidity!”

Going to
Hitler
Would have even been better at least Hitler have the gut to kill himself

But I think they are going to nothing
Which is the death of the entire European nations by Russia nuke

obedience4:



The Inability to effectively comprehend will bring an untimely end to your educational journey... no offence

I said an I quote "WITHOUT an active Pro west guy/guys here this is thread is just a "boring" congregation of pillocks"
Keyword here is "Without"
Are there no pro-west guys here??

Dude stop quoting me please..
Go and read my statement, And always try to assimilate before you ever try to quote me again you this nonentity!!


Pillock

Brainless kasongo 😂😂😂😂

ariesbull:



Well, I don't know why you are arguing it...even ukraine

The problem with Nairalamd is that we have tons of dumb people that don't do basic research and they come here and showcase their stupidity with all their authority

Well Determining the exact number of countries that have conducted elections during wartime is challenging due to the varying definitions of "wartime" and the historical context of each conflict. However, several countries have held elections during periods of conflict. Here are a few notable examples:

1. United States:
- The U.S. has held regular elections during wartime, including during the Civil War (1861-1865), World War I (1914-1918), and World War II (1939-1945).

2. United Kingdom:
- The UK held general elections during both World War I and World War II, including the famous 1945 election that occurred just after the end of World War II in Europe.

3. Israel:
- Israel has conducted elections during various conflicts, including the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the ongoing tensions with Palestine.

4. Lebanon:
- Lebanon has held elections during its civil war (1975-1990) and during periods of conflict with Israel.

5. Afghanistan:
- Afghanistan conducted elections during the ongoing conflict with the Taliban, including the 2014 presidential election.

6. Iraq:
- Iraq held elections during the Iraq War (2003-2011), including the 2005 parliamentary elections.

7. Colombia:
- Colombia has conducted elections during its long-standing conflict with FARC and other guerrilla groups.

8. Sri Lanka:
- Sri Lanka held elections during its civil war with the Tamil Tigers (1983-2009).

9. Ukraine:
- Ukraine conducted elections during the ongoing conflict with Russia, including the 2014 presidential election.

10. Bosnia and Herzegovina:
- Elections were held during the Bosnian War (1992-1995).
Feel free to argue again

You this dude, why write on things you know nothing about.

Do you know there's a difference between a full-scale war and limited conflicts..

The UK general election was postponed due to world war 2 it was supposed to hold in 1940 but was moved to 1945 only after the victory of the allies were secured..A whole 5 years...Here you are crying wolf about a certain Zelensky who hasn't even completed 4 years.. who's country is facing the largest invasion in Europe not seen since the hay days of ww2..

in ww2 also postponed its election and was held once the nation was liberated.

I see you added the Yom Kippur war that's funny. If there's any country with a long history of postponing elections due to military conflicts it will be the Jewish state. Some people even propagated that BIBI is prolonging the war in gaza to keep his hold on power.

The Yom Kippur war was fought in Israeli occupied sinai in the sinai peninsula, and in Israeli controlled goland heights in Syria..hence were was no hostilities in Israelis territories.. even at that the legislative election was postponed and was conducted only after the war has ended.

Here you are f**lishy comparing the Ukrainian war to the Yom Kippur war, A Ukrainian war being fought inside Ukrainian territory. How do you conduct elections when virtually all of Ukraine are under range of Russian missiles..🤣🤣

I see you wrote the Afghanistan war.. funny dude. that wasn't a conventional warfare fought by the taliban..
And this was a limited conflict. In 2014 the US had displaced the taliban and the sect was relegated to the mountainous region of Northern Afghanistan. There was generally a sense of stability in Afghanistan. Also there was a multinational force led by the US providing security for the Afghanistan authorities. who's gonna provide security for electoral officials in Ukraine?? Comparing the conflict in Afghanistan to the war in Ukraine is total rubbish..is like saying Nigeria shouldn't conduct elections because of the insurgency in the north..

The US example is even the worst of them all. Do you even think at all?? The Civil War 1864 elections, the war was fought mainly in controlled confederate states.. the rest of the continental US was largely untouched by the war. The civil war wasn't fought in US territory but in confederate states who seek to succeed from the US.

I see you wrote ww1and ww2, both World Wars,🤣🤣🤣😂 these conflicts did not take place on U.S. soil. The war was fought outside the US, and there was virtually no chance that it should disrupt her electoral process. The closest scenario of US territory getting affected in ww2 was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 and this was outside the continental US territory..

There was no election in Columbia. Only a Plebiscite was done, and this was done after a peace deal was agreed..

The Iraqi elections is also the same as scenario like the Afghanistan elections. The conflict with the terrorist were limited, and the Iraqi had the US military providing security..

The Ukrainian elections was held when seperatists were fighting in the dombass region, there's a huge difference fighting seperatists and an invasion from one of the most powerful military in the world..should Nigerian stop its election process because of hostilities in the north??

The Bosnian, Sri Lanka, labenon examples are limited conflicts..

Ukraine is not the first country to postpone elections during a large scale war and she won't be the last..

Allthelight:
If it is the middle east you will not even know who is bombing you.

Iran is yet to attack israel after close to 3 months

Iran has attacked and disgrace Israel twice. While Isreal attacked Iran only ones with nothing significant to show for it

⚡REPORTER: Would a Russian oligarch be eligible for a gold card?

TRUMP: Yeah, possibly. Hey. I know some Russian oligarchs that are very nice people.

⚡Trump’s Plan to Sell Off Public Lands:

Trump just signed an executive order to create a Sovereign Wealth Fund — and he wants to pay for it by selling off America’s public lands.

This means:

🔴 National parks, forests, and wildlife areas could be sold to the highest bidder.

🔴 Rural communities lose tourism, hunting, and recreation income.

🔴 Private companies get control over public resources.

🔴 Environmental damage from unchecked exploitation.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/trump-quietly-plans-to-liquidate-public-lands-to-finance-his-sovereign-wealth-fund/

Fash20:


Crazy talks. Some were even saying Russia's nukes don't work because they lack the resources needed to maintain them. Don't mind them. this is how they pushed Ukraine into this avoidable war

Russia nukes don't work keh 😂😂
But nothing beat the Russians are using shovel and are out of weapons 😂

Allthelight:
If it is the middle east you will not even know who is bombing you.

Iran is yet to attack israel after close to 3 months

why should they attack?
Are they provoked??

Ricchmoen:
Russia lacks engineer 😷
I don't even want to talk 😂

Maybe him think say all those engines, Submarines, ships, electronics, nuclear pp wey Russia dey build na palm wine tappers dey do am.

Even missiles sef need engineers to make.

The and Japan wey him dey talk of, no fit launch space vehicles to space without US assistance.

⚡Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater PMC, commented on the increasing combat capability of the Russian Army, ing Trump’s push to end the war in Ukraine.

There is almost zero chance that Ukraine will reclaim all its territories. They should have made a deal 1.5 years ago. Now, they are fighting a war of attrition, reverting to World War I-style trench warfare—but with the addition of high-precision drones and missiles, making the battlefield even deadlier.

Russia has far more manpower and ammunition. Meanwhile, the U.S. and Western Europe’s defense industries struggle with high costs and production delays, limiting their effectiveness.

This should be a wake-up call for America—our weapons aren’t performing as expected. Some systems work for a month or two before Russian electronic warfare figures out how to jam navigation, disrupt command lines, or render them useless.

Politicians claim Russia’s military is being degraded. No—the Russian army is now significantly more effective and lethal than at the start of the war.



https://x.com/clashreport/status/1894632310206533681

Let's make this thread an interesting one today.
To all pro-russian, pro-western, pro-truth and pro-neutral fans here.

Given the current geopolitical situation the world is facing today.

Would you prefer A Putin or A Zelensky to be your president?
Choose one and give me a reason why.

Masterviolence:
Let's make this thread an interesting one today.
To all pro-russian, pro-western, pro-truth and pro-neutral fans here.

Given the current geopolitical situation the world is facing today.

Would you prefer A Putin or A Zelensky to be your president?
Choose one and give me a reason why.

Hehehehe

⚡Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov:

Russia and the United States will hold a meeting in Istanbul on February 27 on the work of the embassies of the two countries.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMkK6DCqr/

Biden wanted gangs from Venezuela to enter USA

WriteerNg:
⚡Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater PMC, commented on the increasing combat capability of the Russian Army, ing Trump’s push to end the war in Ukraine.

There is almost zero chance that Ukraine will reclaim all its territories. They should have made a deal 1.5 years ago. Now, they are fighting a war of attrition, reverting to World War I-style trench warfare—but with the addition of high-precision drones and missiles, making the battlefield even deadlier.

Russia has far more manpower and ammunition. Meanwhile, the U.S. and Western Europe’s defense industries struggle with high costs and production delays, limiting their effectiveness.

This should be a wake-up call for America—our weapons aren’t performing as expected. Some systems work for a month or two before Russian electronic warfare figures out how to jam navigation, disrupt command lines, or render them useless.

Politicians claim Russia’s military is being degraded. No—the Russian army is now significantly more effective and lethal than at the start of the war.



https://x.com/clashreport/status/1894632310206533681

They only saying the truth because they lost the proxy war they thought they could win

Kingsnairaland:


They only saying the truth because they lost the proxy war they thought they could win

Exactly.

When you're so great that your enemies have no choice but to it it.

Masterviolence:
Let's make this thread an interesting one today.
To all pro-russian, pro-western, pro-truth and pro-neutral fans here.

Given the current geopolitical situation the world is facing today.

Would you prefer A Putin or A Zelensky to be your president?
Choose one and give me a reason why.

Putin, straight out of the box. Why? At least the man knows how to play the cards, Zelensky is not the kind of man I would love to have rule over me sha. He seems not to have a mind of his own. He's too comic and meak.

JerryStellar:
Putin, straight out of the box. Why? At least the man knows how to play the cards, Zelensky is not the kind of man I would love to have rule over me sha. He seems not to have a mind of his own. He's too comic and meak.

Comic and meek 🤔🤔

It's easy to be tag a strong leader when you virtually have the entire nation in your hands without any form of check and balances.. It also easy to be tag strong when you have a formidable military to call upon..

How many leaders would sit and fight when faced with total annihilation from a vastly superior enemy. The same "comic and meek" Zelensky stood and fought the Russians. We saw Assad cowardly left the throne his grandather and father fought so hard to to him..

I his nightly posts on Telegram. Dude singlehandedly rally his nation during the early stages of the invasion..

Yes the war became long and tiring for the Ukrainians, Russia's numerical advantage and technological superiority would later begin to creap in and untimely the gulf between the military capabilities of both nations would become center stage..

Zelensky is a good leader, Without him at the helm of affairs, there would be no Ukrainian state today..

We all look but see differently the key is perceptions

obedience4:


Comic and meek 🤔🤔

It's easy to be tag a strong leader when you virtually have the entire nation in your hands without any form of check and balances.. It also easy to be tag strong when you have a formidable military to call upon..

How many leaders would sit and fight when faced with total annihilation from a vastly superior enemy. The same "comic and meek" Zelensky stood and fought the Russians. We saw Assad cowardly left the throne his grandather and father fought so hard to to him..

I his nightly posts on Telegram. Dude singlehandedly rally his nation during the early stages of the invasion..

Yes the war became long and tiring for the Ukrainians, Russia's numerical advantage and technological superiority would later begin to creap in and untimely the gulf between the military capabilities of both nations would become center stage..

Zelensky is a good leader, Without him at the helm of affairs, there would be no Ukrainian state today..

We all look but see differently the key is perceptions

It's not about whether he's a good leader or not, the question was to have either of Putin or Zelensky as a leader. Zelensky miscalculated his move in this war, he ought to have known or seen the end even from the beginning. He relied on nations that would be quick to throw him under the bus (imagine discussing Ukraine matters at a table where Ukraine is not represented). I believe Putin will act differently if under the same circumstances you highlighted. That's just what I feel.

⚡Romanian Presidential Candidate Călin Georgescu Detained, According to His Press Office

Romanian presidential candidate Călin Georgescu has been detained, as reported by his press team. The incident occurred when his vehicle was reportedly stopped on the road. Following the stop, Georgescu was taken in for questioning at the General Prosecutor's Office.

Georgescu was planning to officially announce his candidacy today for the presidential elections scheduled for May.

⚡Romanian presidential candidate Călin Georgescu has been detained as a suspect in a case involving allegations of threatening the constitutional order, establishing a fascist organization, and falsifying campaign financing sources.

This information was reported by the Romanian outlet News, citing unnamed sources.

obedience4:



You this dude, why write on things you know nothing about.

Do you know there's a difference between a full-scale war and limited conflicts..

The UK general election was postponed due to world war 2 it was supposed to hold in 1940 but was moved to 1945 only after the victory of the allies were secured..A whole 5 years...Here you are crying wolf about a certain Zelensky who hasn't even completed 4 years.. who's country is facing the largest invasion in Europe not seen since the hay days of ww2..

in ww2 also postponed its election and was held once the nation was liberated.

I see you added the Yom Kippur war that's funny. If there's any country with a long history of postponing elections due to military conflicts it will be the Jewish state. Some people even propagated that BIBI is prolonging the war in gaza to keep his hold on power.

The Yom Kippur war was fought in Israeli occupied sinai in the sinai peninsula, and in Israeli controlled goland heights in Syria..hence were was no hostilities in Israelis territories.. even at that the legislative election was postponed and was conducted only after the war has ended.

Here you are f**lishy comparing the Ukrainian war to the Yom Kippur war, A Ukrainian war being fought inside Ukrainian territory. How do you conduct elections when virtually all of Ukraine are under range of Russian missiles..🤣🤣

I see you wrote the Afghanistan war.. funny dude. that wasn't a conventional warfare fought by the taliban..
And this was a limited conflict. In 2014 the US had displaced the taliban and the sect was relegated to the mountainous region of Northern Afghanistan. There was generally a sense of stability in Afghanistan. Also there was a multinational force led by the US providing security for the Afghanistan authorities. who's gonna provide security for electoral officials in Ukraine?? Comparing the conflict in Afghanistan to the war in Ukraine is total rubbish..is like saying Nigeria shouldn't conduct elections because of the insurgency in the north..

The US example is even the worst of them all. Do you even think at all?? The Civil War 1864 elections, the war was fought mainly in controlled confederate states.. the rest of the continental US was largely untouched by the war. The civil war wasn't fought in US territory but in confederate states who seek to succeed from the US.

I see you wrote ww1and ww2, both World Wars,🤣🤣🤣😂 these conflicts did not take place on U.S. soil. The war was fought outside the US, and there was virtually no chance that it should disrupt her electoral process. The closest scenario of US territory getting affected in ww2 was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 and this was outside the continental US territory..

There was no election in Columbia. Only a Plebiscite was done, and this was done after a peace deal was agreed..

The Iraqi elections is also the same as scenario like the Afghanistan elections. The conflict with the terrorist were limited, and the Iraqi had the US military providing security..

The Ukrainian elections was held when seperatists were fighting in the dombass region, there's a huge difference fighting seperatists and an invasion from one of the most powerful military in the world..should Nigerian stop its election process because of hostilities in the north??

The Bosnian, Sri Lanka, labenon examples are limited conflicts..

Ukraine is not the first country to postpone elections during a large scale war and she won't be the last..

Honestly, you shouldn't have bothered replying that slowpoke called ariesbull or whatever. I clearly stated "all out war" and ruled out "civil war", the idiot was giving me stupid examples he copied without bothering to read.
But since he started his position with degenerative remarks, it's better to just leave the fool to his ignorance to avoid any back and forth.

JerryStellar:
It's not about whether he's a good leader or not, the question was to have either of Putin or Zelensky as a leader. Zelensky miscalculated his move in this war, he ought to have known or seen the end even from the beginning. He relied on nations that would be quick to throw him under the bus (imagine discussing Ukraine matters at a table where Ukraine is not represented). I believe Putin will act differently if under the same circumstances you highlighted. That's just what I feel.

I sincerely like the way you put your statement together.
Logically, is the way to go.

You all read fake news to the extent you started masturbating profusely on an agreement that was yet to be written down nor signed. Well, here you are, the rare earth minerals deal is backed with security guarantees. That's not to talk about the fact that you once said Ukraine has no rare earth minerals or that it was too difficult to mine and all sorts.

Copied from the link:

According to him, paragraph 10 of the agreement states that it “constitutes an integral element of the architecture of bilateral and multilateral agreements, as well as concrete steps to establish lasting peace, strengthen economic and security resilience, and reflect the goals set out in the preamble. [...] The US Government s Ukraine’s efforts to obtain the security guarantees necessary to create lasting peace.”

If in your wildest dream you still think US will substitute Europe for Russia, think again. Yes, there are no permanent friends in politics, but there are cults. UK and US is one such. Except in the event of an apocalypse will the US forsake UK or Israel

Some idiots will still read the word "cult" up there and interpret it to mean the kind of secret cult they practice in Nigeria.

⚡Ukrainian PM Shmyhal:

We are not considering g an agreement with the US without linking it to security guarantees, and this is already included in the draft agreement.

⚡Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov:

Some Syrian groups, such as the Kurds, are showing separatist tendencies.

We hear that some Syrian factions want a self-istration zone, which is a dangerous indicator.

⚡Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan:

Netanyahu’s recent statements on Syria clearly show that Israel is not in favor of peace.

It must put an end to its regional expansionism, which it continues under the guise of ensuring security.